Solutions of the Difference Equation xn+1=xnxn-1-1
نویسندگان
چکیده
and Applied Analysis 3 Proof. We can write terms of a period-three solution of 1.1 as x−1 a, x0 b, x1 ab − 1, x2 b ab − 1 − 1 a ⇐⇒ ab2 − b − 1 a ⇐⇒ ab2 a b 1, x3 a ab − 1 − 1 b ⇐⇒ a2b − a − 1 b ⇐⇒ a2b a b 1. 2.4 Therefore, this is indeed a solution of period three if the system below is satisfied. ab2 a b 1, a2b a b 1. 2.5 Hence we see that ab2 a2b. Thus, this is true if a 0, or if b 0, or if a b when a/ 0 and b / 0. Now it suffices to consider the following three cases. Case 1. Suppose that a 0. Then a2b a b 1 implies that 0 b 1 and hence gives us b −1. Therefore, a period-three solution exists if a 0 and b −1. Case 2. Suppose that b 0. Then a2b a b 1 implies that 0 a 1 and hence gives us a −1. Therefore, a period-three solution exists if a −1 and b 0. Case 3. Suppose that a b such that a/ 0 and b / 0. Then a2b a b 1 implies that a3 2a 1, which gives us a −1. Therefore, a period-three solution exists if a −1 and b −1. Note that a 1 ± √5 /2 are also solutions of a3 2a 1, which are the two equilibria of 1.1 . Hence, there exist exactly three periodic solutions with minimal period three of 1.1 given by x−1 −1, x0 −1, x1 0, . . . ; x−1 −1, x0 0, x1 −1, . . . ; x−1 0, x0 −1, x1 −1, . . . , 2.6 as claimed. In the sequel, we will refer to any one of these three periodic solutions of 1.1 as . . . , 0,−1,−1, 0,−1,−1, . . . . 2.7 The following theorem demonstrates, in a similar way as in 14, 15 , that 1.1 has solutions that are eventually periodic with minimal period three. 4 Abstract and Applied Analysis Theorem 2.2. All eventually periodic solutions with minimal period three are of the form x−1, x0, . . . , xN, xN 1, 0,−1,−1, 0,−1,−1, 0,−1,−1, . . . , 2.8 WhereN ≥ −1, xN 1 a ∈ R\{0}, xN 1/a, and, ifN/ −1, xn−1 xn 1 1 /xn for 0 ≤ n ≤ N. Proof. If {xn}n −1 is an eventually periodic solution with minimal period three, then by Theorem 2.1 there is an N ≥ −1 such that xN 2 0 and xN 3 −1. Hence 0 xN 2 xN 1xN − 1 and consequently xN / 0/ xN 1 and xN 1 1/xN . Let xN 1 a which implies that xN 1/a . From 1.1 , if N/ − 1, we get xn−1 xn 1 1 /xn, for 0 ≤ n ≤ N, as desired. Remark 2.3. If, in Theorem 2.2, a −1, then, among some others, we obtain the solutions in Theorem 2.1. The next theorem shows that no periodic or eventually periodic solution of 1.1 converges to a minimal period-three solution. Theorem 2.4. Let {xn}n −1 be a solution of 1.1 that is neither periodic nor eventually periodic with minimal period three. Then {xn}n −1 does not converge to the minimal period-three solution . . . , 0,−1,−1, 0,−1,−1, . . . . 2.9 Proof. Let {xn}n −1 be a solution of 1.1 that is neither periodic nor eventually periodic with minimal period three. For the sake of contradiction, assume that {xn}n −1 converges to the minimal period-three solution . . . , 0,−1,−1, 0,−1,−1, . . . . 2.10 Then we can choose N ≥ 0 such that there exist − 2 < δ1, δ2, δ3, . . . < 1 2 , −1 < 0, 1, 2, 3, . . . < 1, 2.11
منابع مشابه
Long-Term Behavior of Solutions of the Difference Equation xn+1=xn-1xn-2-1
and Applied Analysis 3 Proof. Assume that xN xN 2k and xN 1 xN 2k 1, for every k ∈ N0, and some N ≥ −2, with xN / xN 1. Then, we have xN 4 xN 2xN 1 − 1 xNxN 1 − 1 xN 3 xN 1. 2.4 From this and since xN 4 xN , we obtain a contradiction, finishing the proof of the result. Theorem 2.3. There are no periodic or eventually periodic solutions of 1.1 with prime period three. Proof. If xN xN 3k, xN 1 xN...
متن کاملGlobal asymptotic stability in a class of generalized Putnam equations
It was conjectured that for every integer m 3 the unique equilibrium c = 1 of the generalized Putnam equation xn+1 = ∑m−2 i=0 xn−i + xn−m+1xn−m xnxn−1 + ∑m i=2 xn−i , n= 0,1,2, . . . , with positive initial conditions is globally asymptotically stable. In this paper, we prove this conjecture. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
متن کاملOn Boundedness of Solutions of the Difference Equation xn+1=(pxn+qxn-1)/(1+xn) for q>1+p>1
We study the boundedness of the difference equation xn 1 pxn qxn−1 / 1 xn , n 0, 1, . . . , where q > 1 p > 1 and the initial values x−1, x0 ∈ 0, ∞ . We show that the solution {xn}n −1 of this equation converges to x q p − 1 if xn ≥ x or xn ≤ x for all n ≥ −1; otherwise {xn}n −1 is unbounded. Besides, we obtain the set of all initial values x−1, x0 ∈ 0, ∞ × 0, ∞ such that the positive solutions...
متن کاملOscillatory and Asymptotic Behavior of Fourth order Quasilinear Difference Equations
where ∆ is the forward difference operator defined by ∆xn = xn+1 −xn, α and β are positive constants, {pn} and {qn} are positive real sequences defined for all n ∈ N(n0) = {n0, n0 + 1, ...}, and n0 a nonnegative integer. By a solution of equation (1), we mean a real sequence {xn} that satisfies equation (1) for all n ∈ N(n0). If any four consecutive values of {xn} are given, then a solution {xn...
متن کاملThe difference equation xn + 1 = α + xn − k ∑ k − 1 i = 0 cixn − i has solutions converging to zero
The aim of this note is to show that the following difference equation: xn+1 = α+ xn−k ∑k−1 i=0 cixn−i , n= 0,1, . . . , where k ∈ N, ci 0, i = 0, . . . , k − 1, ∑k−1 i=0 ci = 1, and α < −1, has solutions which monotonically converge to zero. This result shows the existence of such solutions which was not shown in the recently accepted paper: A.E. Hamza, On the recursive sequence xn+1 = α+ xn−1...
متن کامل